More on the Baptism of Children
Why do we baptize children?
"Unless a man be born again of the water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of heaven" (John 3:5). Neither gender nor age is specified in this passage, despite the rendering of this English translation. Such a fact is important because the suggestion that this passage is a repudiation of infant baptism would be far from the mark. Indeed, given the necessity of baptism, it would point to the latter. Nevertheless, accepting that the passage is addressed to those who have reached the age of reason, we can explore what it means, "to be born again." Just as we receive biological life in the womb, so too can we receive supernatural life from the womb of Mother Church; the water of the baptismal font; and the Holy Spirit. We do not deny that adults need to be taught and to accept the faith prior to baptism. Jesus says as much in his commission to spread the Gospel: "Teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit." However, in reference to children, the faith of parents and the believing community suffices. St. Paul was converted by God's grace at a time when he did not believe in Christ and persecuted the Church. St. John the Baptizer was sanctified prior to his martyrdom, even though he knew little about the faith of Christ. Precedent for such an early initiation into the People of God can be found in the practice of the Jews, the first people called forth. Almighty God can wash children clean of original sin and give them a share in divine life, just as he presumed faith in the Jewish children circumcised on the eighth day as a step toward justification. Jesus would have none hinder the baptism of children. He said: "Suffer these little ones to come to me for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." While something of God's mercy toward children who die while still in their innocence might be implied here, the main point is the inclusivity of God's kingdom and Church. The gravity of baptism should not be dismissed. Jesus tells us that unless one be born again of the water and of the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Do we actually believe that a little baby is infected by the sin of Adam and Eve and has consequently forfeited supernatural life?
Well, the Scriptures speak for themselves. St. Paul tells us: "By one man sin entered this world and by sin death, and so death passed on all men, in whom all have sinned . . . and for as by the disobedience of one man, many were made sinners, so also by the obedience of one, many were made just" (Romans 5:19). He also states: "And if one died for all, then all were dead, and Christ died for all" (1 Corinthians 5:14). As a testimony from the Old Testament, we read in Psalm 50: "In sin did my mother conceive me." Returning to Paul, he tells the Ephesians: "We were by nature children of wrath." Original sin afflicts us, even upon the very day of our conception. Baptism restores supernatural life through Jesus Christ. As for happens to a child who dies prior to baptism, we can take consolation in the fact that God's justice to every soul is perfect and accompanied by a boundless mercy.
Does the Bible actually teach that all sins are forgiven by baptism and that a new life is given us?
St. Paul says: "Be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit" (Acts 2:38). This is prefigured in Exechiel 36:25 when God states: "And I will pour upon you a clean water and you shall be cleansed from all your iniquities." As for regeneration, we read in Galatians: "For you are all children of God . . . For as many of you as have been baptized in Christ have put on Christ." There can be no doubt about it in Titus 3:5,7: "God saved us by the laver of regeneration and renovation [re-creation] of the Holy Spirit, whom he has poured forth on us abundantly . . . that we may be heirs of life everlasting."
Is there any evidence of the Apostles baptizing children?
Yes, they baptized whole households. We read in Acts 10:48 that they baptized the household of Cornelius and in Acts 6:15 that of Lydia. Also do not forget Paul's reception by Stephana, keeper of the prison. It is most probable that there were children in his home, too.
Were children baptized in the early post-Apostolic period?
Early authorities like Origen, Cyprian, and St. Augustine make clear that the baptism of children as soon as possible constituted a tradition handed down by the apostles themselves. The reasoning was that divine grace should not be withheld from anyone.
Is it wrong to presume faith in a small child or infant?
No, just as a child can be made an heir of earthly property, long before they have the faculty of consenting to receive it, so too in baptism, infants can be made heirs of heaven.


1 Comments:
"Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ." (Col. 2:8)
What happened? The Catholic Church doesn't believe in LIMBO anymore? If a baby dies before getting sprinkled (which you claim water SAVES) by a Roman Catholic priest, then just hope for the best?
God does not hold anyone accountable until they have a knowledge between GOOD AND EVIL. (Deut. 1:39) Notice it doesn't say between "right and wrong," because a child can be taught the difference between right and wrong, but no one can teach him the difference between good and evil, for this knowledge comes depending on the maturity of each individual.
So infants or mentally retarded, for that matter, are in a state of innocence until they have a knowledge of the law (Rom. 5:13). If there is no knowledge that sin is a violation of the law (Rom. 4:15), even though they were born "dead in trespasses and sin" (Eph 2:1) and inherited a sinful nature (Ps. 51:5), sin is not imputed to the individual (Rom. 5:8).
If an infant or child dies because of Adam's sin (Rom. 5:12), then he died for someone else's transgression, when he has not committed an act of sin. So as the table turns, a young child can be saved without an act of receiving Christ. Christ's righteousness can be imputed to the child without works (Rom. 5:8) on the basis on his condition, which is innocence (Gen. 2; Deut. 1:39).
Now, were he to have an inward knowledge of the law (Rom. 7:8-10; 3:19), knowing the difference between good and evil, that's something else. It's too late then. Hell will be his destiny until he deliberately chooses God's righteousness.
Jenkins: "Does the Bible actually teach that all sins are forgiven by baptism and that a new life is given us?"
I knew it was coming!
St. Paul says: "Be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit" (Acts 2:38). This is prefigured in Exechiel 36:25 when God states: "And I will pour upon you a clean water and you shall be cleansed from all your iniquities."
Read Acts 2. It is dealing with the NATION OF ISRAEL. As far as the passage you quote from Ezekiel, again, this is dealing with Israel after the Tribulation.
You have been directed to many passages of Scripture to counter your false teachings. It is very obvious your interpretation is a private one. You are wresting and distorting clear passages and using obscure passages as proof text for your private interpretation.
When we read the book of Acts, we must remember that this is a TRANSITIONAL time taking place. The record of Acts is the beginning of the New Testament Church in its initial stage. We find events that are unique and not necessarily repeated in the same manner. For example, you will not find Acts 2 duplicated again in Acts 8. The Book of Acts is the wrong place to set a pattern of how one is saved for the entire Church age. This is a book where a lot of false doctrines erect. We must keep in mind that it is primarily a historical book, not a book to devise doctrines. One needs to go to the New Testament Epistles for the revelation of the Church and how it functions.
Suffice to say, Peter spoke to ISRAEL, because the message is aimed at ISRAEL (see Acts 2:22, 36), not "Christians" When we get to Acts 7, the response was rejection concerning the Messiah by ISRAEL, and thus Stephen was stoned to death. It was from here God turned to the Gentiles (explained in Rom.9-11). After a certain amount of time had passed, Acts 2 was never repeated again. Receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost was no longer contingent on water baptism, and Peter learned this lesson when he witnessed the Gentiles get the Holy Ghost BEFORE he could tell them to get in water! (Acts 10:44-46).
City water, nor "blessed water" by the Roman Catholic Church saves anybody. The water simply gets you wet, that's all.
Water baptism does not save. Water baptism did not saved Simon the magician. Peter even warned him that his heart was not right with God and that he was still bound by sin (Acts 8:21,23). Water baptism didn't even save Judas who betrayed Jesus.
The woman who came in and washed Jesus' feet with her tears and dried them with her hair, what did Jesus tell her? Did he say, "Your baptism saves you?" No, He said, "Thy faith hath saved thee; go in peace." Hmmm. Faith alone saved her and Jesus said so!
What else did Jesus say of how to get everlasting life? "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life." (John 5:24)
Anything in there about water baptism? No.
What else did Jesus say? "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life." (John 6:47)
Anything in there about water baptism? No.
What about, "He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him." (John 3:36)
Anything in there about water baptism? No.
Again, "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)
Anything about water baptism saving? No. It's simply BELIEVING on Jesus Christ that one is saved.
As for Ezekiel 36:25, this reference is often used to falsely justify the sprinkling of infants for baptism, but the doctrine refers to the water of purification of the Jews ( Num 8:7 ) . I showed you previously how water is the instrument of the first birth, not the second birth ( Pro 5:15-18 , Is 48:1 , John 3:5-6 ) . Water purification was cleansing for the body not the soul . ( Num 19:9 )
As for regeneration, we read in Galatians: "For you are all children of God . . . For as many of you as have been baptized in Christ have put on Christ."
The passage you speak of is in Gal. 3:27. That is not speaking of "water" baptism, that is "Spiritual baptism." Look at verse 28, "There is neither.......MALE OR FEMALE....." How can you say that baptism is verse 27 was physical?
There can be no doubt about it in Titus 3:5,7: "God saved us by the laver of regeneration and renovation [re-creation] of the Holy Spirit, whom he has poured forth on us abundantly . . . that we may be heirs of life everlasting."
It is amazing to see what you are doing with these Scriptures. The verse reads:
Tit 3:5 "Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;" (Titus 3:5)
It does not read, "by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of water baptism."
Acts 10:48
Yes, they baptized whole households. We read in Acts 10:48
NO. You ASSUME there were children there. See above where this was discussed.
You are trying so desperately to prove water baptism saves. There are so many verses against your private interpretation.
Jenkins: "...that they baptized the household of Cornelius and in Acts 6:15 that of Lydia. Also do not forget Paul's reception by Stephana, keeper of the prison. It is most probable that there were children in his home, too."
To quote you, "It is MOST PROBABLE." Even you can't find the evidence you are trying to prove.
Jenkins: "Were children baptized in the early post-Apostolic period?"
"Early authorities like Origen, Cyprian, and St. Augustine make clear that the baptism of children as soon as possible constituted a tradition handed down by the apostles themselves. The reasoning was that divine grace should not be withheld from anyone."
It now begins. When one can't get proof from the Bible for his private interpretation, he must start quoting apostates.
Jenkins: "Is it wrong to presume faith in a small child or infant? No, just as a child can be made an heir of earthly property, long before they have the faculty of consenting to receive it, so too in baptism, infants can be made heirs of heaven."
See above where this was covered where it concerned children and in a state of innocence until they have knowledge between good and evil. As long as they don't, sin is not imputed to them.
Reposted for SANDY HOOPER.
Post a Comment
<< Home